A working pilot's reference.

What to check before you launch, how Swiss weather patterns shape flyability, and when to walk the wing down instead of flying it.

Knowledge specific to hike-and-fly (H&F) paragliding — the format most Wingtrail sites are built around.


1. Pre-launch: the 5-point check

The standard pre-flight check, applied to every launch. Radiates from the pilot outward:

  1. Equipment — harness (especially leg straps), helmet, risers clipped to carabiners, radio, speed bar.
  2. Risers & Lines — brake lines below other lines, stabilizer lines clear and outside, no snags or loops.
  3. Wing — symmetrical arc layout, no tangles, leading edge clean.
  4. Wind — speed and direction re-checked at the last moment.
  5. Airspace — nothing else in the air in front of or above launch.

Order: always the same sequence. Any consistent order is fine, but it must be routine so you never skip one. Last thing before takeoff = check wind + airspace again.

Implication for H&F fatigue: after a 3-hour hike, shortcut habits are the risk. The check is more important when you're tired, not less. If the app ever adds a pre-launch checklist feature, this list is canonical.


2. Site evaluation for unfamiliar sites

When arriving at an unknown launch, the pilot should inspect:

  • Takeoff slope — open, regular, moderately inclined. Hidden obstacles, uneven ground, terrain beyond line of sight all need active inspection before unpacking.
  • Decision line — the point beyond which abort is no longer safe. Roughly <10 m in front of where the wing is laid out, but depends on wind + wing loading. Weaker headwind + higher loading → decision line farther out.
  • Point of no return — the limit beyond which the pilot must already be airborne to clear obstacles.
  • Behind launch — especially important in winds >20 km/h where the glider can move backward on inflation. The area behind must be wide, open, obstacle-free, no cliffs downwind.
  • Landing zone — wind direction options, obstacles on approach. Inspect before flying.

Four factors to know in advance:

  1. Weather — general + local expected during the flight window.
  2. Legal — airspace, temporary restrictions.
  3. Obstacles — cables, towers, cliffs, trees on approach.
  4. Wildlife — eagle nesting (March–May, cliffs below forest line), chamois/ibex on south slopes.

3. High-altitude H&F (3000 m+ launches)

Several of Wingtrail's featured sites are high alpine: Weissmies (3991 m), Klein Matterhorn (3792 m), Jungfraujoch (3471 m), Piz Nair (2991 m), Titlis (3061 m), Corvatsch (3251 m), Gemsfairenstock (2940 m).

Physiological effects to respect:

Hypoxia

  • Kicks in from ~4000 m (mild euphoria, slowing motor + sensory skills).
  • Acute mountain sickness (AMS) possible from 2800–3500 m after 5–10 h exposure — severe headache, breathlessness. Short flight duration makes AMS rare for pilots but the multi-hour hike before launch adds exposure.
  • Pre-existing fatigue, lack of sleep, alcohol, tobacco all increase sensitivity.
  • Treatment: rapid altitude loss (easy for a pilot — just fly down).

Thin-air performance

  • Lower air density → glider needs higher true airspeed to maintain lift.
  • Launch run is longer and more exhausting.
  • Sink rate over ground is higher.
  • Stall speed in true airspeed is unchanged but the margin feels tighter.

Cold + wind chill

  • Glider flying at 32 km/h in 2 °C air feels like −11 °C.
  • Heat loss increases oxygen demand and reduces performance. Dress for cruise temp, not launch temp.

Ears / sinuses

Altitude changes pressurize sinus cavities. A cold, sinus infection, or ear infection can cause severe pain during climb-out or descent. Don't fly with congestion.


4. Wind & conditions specific to H&F

Headwind on launch

  • Ideal: ~15 km/h headwind — reduces ground run, ideal for heavier H&F-loaded wings.
  • Zero/tailwind: longer runway needed, running speed higher.
  • >5 km/h tailwind: abort — insufficient airspeed at takeoff, reduced glide ratio, high accident risk.
  • >20 km/h headwind: risk of backward inflation — reverse launch mandatory, watch the area behind.

Cross-wind technique

If wind is off-axis to the slope (e.g. 120° wind on a south-facing slope), inflate into wind, then pivot toward the slope during the control phase, then accelerate. Don't inflate directly down the slope in a crosswind.

Wet wing

A wet wing adds several kg, needs higher airspeed, inflates poorly, and has higher stall risk. H&F with any morning rain / heavy dew = check the wing before packing and dry it if possible.


5. Walk-out vs fly-down — the core H&F decision

The decision to abandon the fly-down is as important as the decision to launch. If in doubt, don't fly. Applied to H&F:

  • Ascent took longer than planned → less daylight → higher OD risk.
  • Conditions deteriorate during the ascent → the walk-down is always available and always safer.
  • The wing weighs ~4 kg in the pack — walking out with it is not a failure, it's a legitimate outcome.

Signals to walk down instead of fly:

  • Cu congestus already present by early afternoon.
  • Wind on launch >70% of site maxWind and gusting.
  • Föhn gradient rose during the ascent.
  • Sunset within 1 h — post-sunset conditions become cold, shadow-triggered katabatic flow starts, and emergency landing options shrink in low light.

6. Emergency descent maneuvers

If caught in stronger-than-expected lift (e.g. under Cb suction, powerful thermal) and needing to descend fast, three options:

  • Big ears — pull outer A risers to fold wingtips. Modest sink rate increase, maintained direction, safe.
  • B-stall — pull B risers symmetrically to distort profile. Strong descent. Risk: parachutal stall on exit — release B risers quickly and decisively to recover flight speed.
  • Spiral dive — tight 360° turns. Highest descent rate. High G-forces; requires mastery especially in turbulent air.

Normal paraglider sink rate is ~1 m/s. These maneuvers reach 5–10 m/s. Necessary tool if caught under a developing Cb — but the better rule is not to be there: don't launch into a day with Cb already forming.


7. Landing — slope landings

H&F pilots more often land in non-standard terrain than park pilots.

Against vs with the slope

  • Against the slope (up-slope approach): easy to be precise, but ground contact is rougher.
  • With the slope (down-slope approach): gentle contact but precision is difficult — wing keeps flying.

Neither is inherently wrong — terrain and obstacles dictate.

Turbulence barriers

Any obstacle upwind of the landing (trees, buildings, rocks) creates turbulence downwind extending up to 10× its height. Pick landing approaches with clear upwind air.

Emergency landing (parachute)

If a reserve parachute is deployed, pilot should:

  1. Pull B or C lines on the main wing to prevent it re-flying and interfering with the reserve.
  2. Sit up, knees slightly bent and together.
  3. Prepare for ground contact at 5–6 m/s (equivalent to a 1.5 m free fall).

This is a last-resort; pilots should train the posture before needing it.


8. Wildlife-aware H&F

Paragliding clubs have agreements with Swiss game wardens. Three species to respect:

  • Golden eagle — nests March–May on cliffs just below the forest line. Flying near nests causes adults to abandon eggs. Territory ~100 km². Avoid close passes to cliff nest sites in spring.
  • Chamois and ibex — winter/spring on south-facing slopes. Females give birth May (chamois) and June (ibex). Summer: they retreat to shaded cliffs and ridges to rest. Low passes on slopes in uninhabited alpine regions disturb them most.

A future feature could flag sites with seasonal wildlife protection zones during breeding season.


9. Skill-level gating

Wingtrail sites include Easy / Medium / Hard difficulty ratings. Hard sites tend to combine:

  • High altitude (>3000 m, thin air + hypoxia)
  • Narrow/technical launch slope
  • Shorter decision line
  • Obstacles close to launch
  • Strong thermal turbulence typical
  • Or wind acceleration through terrain features (Venturi)

Examples: Weissmies (3991 m) — altitude + terrain. Klein Matterhorn (3792 m) — altitude + often strong winds. Fronalpstock (1883 m) — technical launch. Uetliberg (740 m) — surprising for its altitude, but urban/obstacle complexity.

A flyability app should not gate by pilot skill (we don't know the user's rating). But in user-facing copy, Hard sites should carry a visible note that weather "green" doesn't overrule terrain difficulty.